Record Yield
← All posts
Privacy & law5 August 2026 · 2 min read

Pseudonymised isn't anonymised: where the ICO draws the line

Replace every name in a file with a code and it feels anonymous, but under UK GDPR that's still personal data if anyone can link it back.

The ICO's view

The ICO's anonymisation guidance, published in 2025, treats identifiability as a spectrum, not a switch. Pseudonymised data, where a key can restore identities, remains personal data.

IDENTIFIABLEANONYMOUSRaw recordsnames, emailsPseudonymisedkey existsDe-identifiedkey destroyed, testedAnonymousno reasonable route back
The identifiability spectrumBased on ICO anonymisation and pseudonymisation guidance (2025)

What that means in practice

  • Keep or destroy the key, but never send it to a buyer.
  • Test the output: could a motivated intruder re-identify people?
  • Reassess when new data becomes available that could enable linking.
Key takeaways
  • Codes alone don't anonymise.
  • Anonymisation is judged in context and can change over time.
  • Test before transfer, and document the test.

What could your company's records earn?

A free, nine-question estimate. No files, no logins.

Get a free valuation →

More in Privacy & law